Showing posts with label equality. Show all posts
Showing posts with label equality. Show all posts

Friday, 16 September 2016

Holocaust Memorial Day Commemoration: Saturday, January 28th 2017

The text of my HMD presentation to the Wellingborough commemorative event held on Saturday January 28th 2017 at the Wellingborough Museum

Good morning. Thank you for this opportunity to give this presentation to you today. It’s an honour and privilege and I hope that you find it interesting, but also challenging – for which I don’t apologise!

Yesterday was Holocaust Memorial Day which is commemorated on 27 January every year in commemoration of the liberation of Auschwitz extermination camp in Poland by Russian/Soviet troops in 1945 towards the end of the Second World War.

What was the Holocaust?

Between 1941 and 1945, the Nazis attempted to kill all of Europe’s Jews. This systematic and planned attempt to murder all Jewish people in Europe is known as the Holocaust (The Shoah in Hebrew) and it is unique in Human history. The first time an attempt was made to eliminate a whole group of people based on their religion/race/ethnicity using the whole apparatus of a modern state and society.

The holocaust also resulted in the murder of millions more as a result of prejudice and hatred: homosexuals, Gypsies, Jehovah’s Witnesses, disabled people, Black people and other ethnic minorities, and political opponents of the Nazis.

From the time they assumed power in 1933, the Nazis used propaganda, persecution, and legislation to deny human and civil rights to Jews and other groups. They used centuries of antisemitism (hatred of Jewish people) as their foundation and new pseudo-scientific ideas of eugenics and the notation iof creating a “perfect human being”. By the end of the Holocaust, six million Jewish men, women and children had either perished in ghettos or through mass-shootings, in concentration camps and by gassing in extermination camps, such as Auschwitz.

Can you imagine what six million people looks like? It’s hard. That’s at least 200+ football stadiums (with 30,000 capacities each) or 100 towns the size of Wellingborough: women, men, children and older people, all murdered.

Ivor Perl

Today we are going to watch a short film clip, in which this man, Ivor Perl, who was born in Hungary, tells us his experiences during the Holocaust.


Watching Ivor’s film tells us about the stories beyond those statistics which are too huge for us to comprehend. It tells us that the Holocaust was the story of Jewish people being forced to move from their own homes to ghettos and camps. Of families being forced apart. Of the diseases like typhus which were allowed to spread as people were forced to live in appalling conditions. And his story tells us that half of Hungary’s Jewish population were killed in only four months in 1944, and that Ivor himself lost all but one of his 8 brothers and sisters, and both of his parents.

Ivor’s testimony also tells us that, for Ivor, the legacy of the Holocaust continues. He tells us that he fears people more than he fears God; it was people who played with him as friends one week and on the second week herded him and his family into a ghetto. He speaks of his daily reminders of things which happened to him in the past.

But he also speaks of his delight at moving to the UK and beginning to set up a life here, displaying so proudly in his home the pictures of his children and grandchildren. He tells us about his talks in schools and community groups, and that he feels if only one person hears his story and makes a difference, it was worth his while.

There are hundreds of us here today. On Holocaust Memorial Day we can reflect on the ways in which we can make a difference after hearing Ivor’s testimony. We can reflect on the particular questions that Ivor asked in the film.

What has it helped?

He asks ’What has the world learned since 1945?’ and, sadly, since the end of World War Two, there have been genocides in Cambodia, Rwanda, Bosnia, and Darfur where millions of people have been murdered simply because of who they are. This suggests the world has not learnt much. So what can we learn?

Our understanding of social psychology – how our brains work within a social context - might have some of the answers. This tells us that all human beings (you, me, and others) are all capable, given the wrong/right circumstances, of committing great crimes and horrors. Genocides and human rights abuses are not committed by evil people, but by people, just like you and me, doing evil thinks to other human beings.

  • Playing the “us”/“them” game of stigmatising groups in society who we don’t like or blaming for all our problems. Or holding prejudicial or stereotyped views of such groups. We do this easily and almost automatically, without thought. We are easily seduced by the lies and misrepresentations of unprincipled politicians hungry for votes and power who tell us such groups are to blame. And what groups are in the frame in today’s world for such demonisation and hatred?  Mexicans (in the US), Muslims, refugees, immigrants, migrants from the European Union, asylum-seekers, benefit scroungers... you can add your own favourites if you like as more are added on an almost daily basis as we split up into our own clans and comfortable zones of exclusion behind walls, borders and fences – physical structures - but possibly even more damaging divisions in our minds and thoughts. Us and them... it’s an easy game to play, but with disastrous consequences.

  • Inflicting harm on “others”, especially those who are stigmatised: being blind to their suffering or actively creating the conditions in which harm is done: harassment and hate crimes; our indifference or even hostility to hundreds of thousands of refugees, some of whom are dying in the Mediterranean or freezing to death in Serbia or Greece, or living in dire conditions in concentrations camps at the borders of Hungary; our indifference to disabled people who are dying or committing suicide because of the dehumanising nature of our benefit system; physical attacks on Polish people, or Muslims, or indeed anyone who stands up for minorities and the vulnerable – such as MP Jo Cox.

  •  But I hear you say: “we wouldn’t do that, we wouldn’t do harm to others”. But what would you do I ask?


How would I have behaved?

·        Ivor Perl asks us to reflect on our own actions or inactions. Do we/you stand by and watch, or do you say “no, this is wrong, it must stop!”? Do you actively get involved in challenging prejudice and injustices? Would you stand up or would you remain silent?

Ivor asked ‘how would I have behaved if I had been the gentile (the person who was not Jewish)?’ We can also ask ourselves ‘what would I have done if I had seen my neighbours forced out of their homes and onto trains or into ghettoes simply for who they were? Would I have stood by? Or would I have spoken out?’ The Holocaust was allowed to happen because the people with the power and the knowledge to stop it stood by and did nothing.

So in the contemporary world we need to ask: what am I doing?

Elie Wiesel

At the end of Ivor’s film he says ‘the only thing we can do is not answer hate with hate.’ Perhaps we can challenge ourselves to go even further.

As Elie Wiesel, another Holocaust survivor, wrote:

‘I swore never to be silent whenever and wherever human beings endure suffering and humiliation. We must always take sides. Neutrality helps the oppressor, never the victim. Silence encourages the tormentor, never the tormented.

Don’t stand by

With the words of Ivor Perl and Elie Wiesel in mind, with our understanding of human psychology in mind, I would ask you today to commit to not standing by.

When we see acts of injustice, don’t stand by. When we hear of intolerance, don’t stand by. When we see people being picked on because of who they are, don’t stand by. And when we see others act on their hatred, don’t stand by. And, if and when we see others “not standing by” and challenging, support them too – especially if we don’t have the courage to do it ourselves.

If we can all make the commitment today that we will not stand by when others face prejudice, perhaps we can help the world learn lessons from the past to create a better, safer future.

HMD 2017 Film

I would like to finish with another short film that has been produced for HMD 2017. It challenges us to think about how we can support those who face hostility today and create a safer society together.


Call Mr. Robeson comes to Wellingborough

Black History Month 2016 and Hate Crime Awareness Week

Wellingborough Afro-Caribbean Association (WACA) 

presents in conjuction with
Northamptonshire Rights and Equality Council (NREC), UNISON, UNITE–the union, National Union of Teacher, Independent Socialists in Wellingborough (ISW), The Big Lottery


Paul Robeson is a world-famous actor, singer and civil rights campaigner. When he gets too radical and outspoken for the establishment's liking, he is branded a traitor to his country, is harassed, and denied opportunities to perform or travel.

This roller-coaster journey through Robeson’s remarkable life highlights how his pioneering and heroic political activism led many to describe him as the forerunner of the civil rights movement. It features some famous songs (including a dramatic rendition of Ol’ Man River), speeches, and a spectacularly defiant testimony to the US Senate House Un-American Activities Committee in the 1950s.

Friday   October 14th   2016
7.30pm
FREE Caribbean buffet food from 6.00pm

Rock Street Centre Rock Street
Wellingborough NN8 4LW

Tickets:
£6.00 in advance (see below)
£8.00 on the door
           
Disabled access             BSL Signers for the deaf

Or tickets can be purchased from WACA and
NREC (cash or cheque – payable to WACA)
Further info: telephone Paul 07872836463

     

Tuesday, 3 November 2015

Sunday, 18 October 2015

There are more disadvantaged children in Britain than in many other advanced economies

There are more disadvantaged children and young people in the UK than in other advanced economies

A higher proportion of UK children grow up in households with incomes well below the national median, while more young people in the UK are not in education, employment or training

To download the full pdf, click here

Explaining the data

These figures are taken from the UNICEF Innocenti Report Card, an annual comparison of living standards for children and young people in advanced economies. The figures are from 2012 (child poverty) and 2013 (young people not in education, training or employment) because these are the figures used in the most recent version of the report. You can read the full report here:http://www.unicef-irc.org/publications/pdf/rc12-eng-web.pdf

*****

Wednesday, 20 May 2015

The richest 10% of the population get richer whilst incomes for the poorest 10% plummet

the rich get richer, the poor get poorer

To download the pdf, click here

Explaining the data

Explaining the data: These figures were calculated by the New Economics Foundation (NEF) as part of their ‘Real Britain Index’ - http://www.realbritainindex.org/. NEF calculated a more detailed inflation figure for each decile (group of 10%) of the UK population from richest to poorest, based on their spending habits (for example, the poorest decile spend a higher proportion of their income on food, so are hit harder by food price increases, but are less likely to be affected by changes in the cost of luxury goods). NEF then used these inflation figures to calculate the year-on-year change in the incomes of each decile. Since the data used in this infographic was published, inflation has fallen, giving hope that real incomes of poorer households will rise. But this will also depend on factors such as low pay and cuts to social security. 


********

Thursday, 16 April 2015

The gap between the richest and poorest region in the UK is the biggest in Europe

Displaying

To download the full pdf, click here
Explaining the data
These figures are taken from data compiled by Eurostat, the data agency of the European Union. Although we have only shown figures for a selection of countries commonly compared with the UK in terms of equality and economic success, there is no other country in the whole of the EU where the richest region is nearly 5 times as rich as the poorest. The currency used by Eurostat is the ‘Purchasing Power Standard’, an economic measurement that accounts for differences in the value of different currencies, as well as the different costs in different areas.  Full data is available fromhttp://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/tgm/table.do?tab=table&init=1&language=en&pcode=tgs00005&plugin=1   


********

Wednesday, 11 March 2015

The rich get richer, the poor get poorer. What a surprise!

Between 2007 and 2013, cash benefits paid to the richest fifth of the population increased by 42%. For the poorest fifth, benefits fell by 5%

Since the recession, cash benefits have INCREASED for the richest fifth of the population, but declined for the poorest fifth
To download the full pdf, click here

Explaining the data
Here we have relied on a dataset produced by the Office for National Statistics. This data tracks the effects of taxes and benefits on household income over time. The series runs from 1977 to 2013 and is available here (table 14a). These figures are produced based on the average amount of cash benefits, original income and gross income received by households across the income distribution. We have rounded figures to the nearest whole number for clarity, but for accuracy the bottom, middle and top income quintiles of the income distribution saw an average real-term change in their receipt of cash benefits by 4.6%, 3.3% and 41.6% respectively. Calculations are based on RPI deflation

********

Saturday, 17 January 2015

Poorer Children are already disadvantaged before they even start school. Differences in income hinder children's progress from a very young age

Poorer children are less likely to be ready for school meaning it is more difficult for them to make progress in their education

To download the full pdf click here

Explaining the data
Academics analysed a group of children at the age of 3 and 5, comparing their school readiness and their reading age. They compared the average score for each income group, ranging from the richest fifth to the poorest fifth, to the overall median. In each category, Children in the poorest fifth averaged a score that was well below the overall median, while the richest fifth were significantly above the median. So, for example, the average 3 year old born into the richest fifth of the population scored 63 (meaning a score higher than 63% of all children) for school readiness, while the average score in the poorest fifth was just 32. Obviously, the median for all 3 year olds was 50, below the richest, but above the poorest. This chart is taken from Professor John Hills’s book ‘Good Times, Bad Times: the welfare myth of them and us’ published by ‘Policy Press’ in November 2014.


*******

Sunday, 30 November 2014

The myth of social mobility in the UK: the rich stay rich and the poor stay poor

Displaying

To download a full pdf, click here

Explaining the data
This data is taken from a study by Miles Corak, Income inequality, equality of opportunity and intergenerational mobility, published in The Journal of Economic Perspectives, volume 27 number 3, pages 79-102 


******

Saturday, 22 November 2014

Poorest 80% of population have seen their share of incomes drop since 1979

Displaying

To download the full pdf, click here

Explaining the data
This chart is taken from Professor John Hills’s book 'Changing Lives, Welfare State. Why we really are all in it together’ published by ‘Policy Press’ in November 2014 The figures are taken from earlier analyses by Jenkins SP and Cowell F 'Dwarfs and Giants in the 1980s: Trends in UK income distribution' (1993) and Adams N, Carr J, Collins J, Johnson G and Matejic P, Households Below Average Income: An analysis of the income distribution, 1994/95 to 2010/11(2012). 



*********

Friday, 3 October 2014

Most people think significant pay differentials unfair

Most people think pay differences between high and low earners are unfair

To download the full pdf click here

Explaining the data
This data was taken from polling carried out by ICM on behalf of the High Pay Centre. Though polling results depend on how the question is phrased, when asked if they agreed that “pay gaps in the UK are necessary to encourage people to work hard and take risks”, just 32% of respondents agreed, while 55% disagreed. Therefore it is clear that a majority of people think that the gap between those at the top and low and middle earners has grown too large. The results can be found at www.highpaycentre.org 


****

Tuesday, 23 September 2014

Most households would be much better off in a more equal society

The richest 1% in the UK have more than double the share of the richest 1% in Holland or Denmark.


To download the full pdf, click here

Explaining the data
All figures for the share of the richest 1 per cent, plus the UK’s estimated total income, are taken from the World Top Incomes Database via http://topincomes.parisschoolofeconomics.eu.
Of course, if measures were introduced to reduce the share of income going to the richest 1% in the UK, then the £1 trillion total income might also change. But the fact that the share of incomes going to the richest people is much smaller in other modern, prosperous societies like Denmark and the Netherlands  suggests that inequality is not a necessary price of economic success. In fact, research from the International Monetary Fund suggests that inequality hinders economic growth (you can read their paper at http://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/sdn/2014/sdn1402.pdf). The benefits of reducing the share of UK incomes going to the top 1% maybe worth even more than £2,500 per household.

*******

Sunday, 10 August 2014

Incomes increased for the richest last year, but fell for everyone else

Incomes increased for the richest fifth of the population last year, but fell for everyone else

The richest fifth of the UK population saw their incomes increase by £940 in 2013. But incomes were down by £250 for the other 80% of the population... and by £381 for the poorest fifth.

To download the full pdf, click here

Explaining the data
This data compares the ‘equivalised disposable household income’ for 2011/12 and 2012/13. It was published by the Office for National Statistics as part of ‘the effects of UK tax and benefits on household income 2012/13 study.’ ONS have found that the recession did have a small effect on reducing inequality, but it now looks as though inequality maybe set to increase. The figures are available online via http://www.ons.gov.uk/ons/publications/re-reference-tables.html?edition=tcm%3A77-333039 


************

Friday, 1 August 2014

Race equality activists and campaigners demand better political leadership on issues such as race equality and immigration.

Open letter
In an unprecedented move race equality activists and campaigners have written to each of the main party leaders to demand better political leadership on issues such as race equality and immigration.
Tackling race inequality has all but fallen off the political agenda and the Immigration debate can only be characterised as a race to the bottom of a dirty barrel. The signatories also lament the silent, self-imposed toothless Equality and Human Rights Commission. Please feel free to join the debate and put your name to the list of signatories. To add your name email: razia63@hotmail.co.uk

See also:
http://blackactivistsrisingagainstcuts.blogspot.co.uk/2014/07/press-release-open-letter-about-racism.html

http://www.obv.org.uk/news-blogs/uk-political-leaders-don-t-shame-us

http://www.migrantsrights.org.uk/news/2014/race-equality-organisations-call-party-leaders-raise-tone-public-discussion

Dear Mr. Cameron, Mr Miliband, and Mr Clegg,
We are proud to live in a diverse Britain. Our society is more vibrant, dynamic and creative: our lives and values are richer for it. It is the reason behind London’s commercial success and why we secured the 2012 Olympics.
How quickly pride turns to shame.
We are now deeply worried about race relations, the rising tide of Islamophobia and anti-immigrant sentiment, which are fuelled by the open disdain shown by many politicians for policies which promote a more equal and inclusive society. We are ashamed of:-
  • ‘Go home’ immigration vans
  • the vilification of migrant workers
  • the persistent linking of Muslim communities with violent extremism
  • the ‘British’ values agenda
  • institutional tolerance of celebrity racism
  • the refusal of political leaders to challenge hostile attitudes to particular sections of the black and other minority ethnic communities.
The reins on racist behaviour have been loosened: anti-immigrant and Islamophobic fervour, propagated by certain sections of the media and some politicians are in danger of unwittingly – and at times wittingly - inciting racial hatred. It is now open season for racists.
There is an Equality and Human Rights Commission, but it is silent, weak, aloof and ineffective. There is a Government Equalities Office but it has no vision for an inclusive society beyond women on boards. There are political leaders but no leadership.
This toxic environment is damaging British society and, potentially, its international reputation. We urge you to take immediate action to avoid serious harm to community relations by:
  • a commitment not to use the politics of ‘difference’ to marginalise communities
  • the release of the GEO Programme Fund to projects which promote good relations
  • a manifesto commitment to implementing a race and good relations strategy
  • restoring the power to promote good relations to the Equality and Human Rights Commission and ensuring that the EHRC uses its powers effectively.
Above all, we ask you not to choke the voice of reason and tolerance.
And, in case you think we do not matter, remember that the ethnic minority vote matters in key marginal constituencies.
Yours sincerely,
Organisations:
Zita Holbourne Co-Founder, BARAC
Sado Jirde, Director, Black South West Network
Belfast Migrant Centre
Tony Lindsay Project Manager, CHESS
Serah Kimuyu, Advice and Support Officer, Central Scotland Regional Equality Council (CSREC)
Professor Nira Yuval Davis, Director, The Centre for Research on Migration Refugees and Belonging, University of East London
Sarah Soyei, Head of Partnerships, EqualiTeach
Karen Chouhan Founder and Director Equanomics UK
Sameena Choudry Founder, Equitable Education
Chris Whitwell Director, Friends, Families and Travellers
Kamaljeet Jandu, National Officer, GMB
Robin Richardson Director, Insted Consultancy
Liz Fekete Executive Director, Institute of Race Relations
Ratna Lachman Director JUST West Yorkshire
Peter Williams, Chair, Kingsgate Community Centre
Don Flynn, Director, Migrant Rights Network
Suresh Grover Founder and Director,The Monitoring Group
Patrick Yu, Director, Northern Ireland Council for Ethnic Minorities,
Paul Crofts, Vice Chair, Northamptonshire Rights and Equality Council
Janie Codona MBE One Voice 4 Travellers Ltd
Simon Woolley, Director, Operation Black Vote
Andy Gregg, Chief Executive, Race On The Agenda
Omar Khan, Director, The Runnymede Trust
Peter Herbert, Chair, The Society of Black Lawyers
Joy Warmington, CEO, Birmingham Race Action Partnership
Individuals:
Olu Alake
Mohammed Aziz
Maud Blair
Ralph Braunholtz
Liz Brooker
Barbara Cohen
Dr. Tony Cotton
Dr. Jacqui Cousins
Lindsay Edkins
Angela Crum Ewing
Alison Graham
John Haywood
Ibrahim Hashi Jama
Makbool Javaid
Saleema Karim
Jane Lane
Harmesh Lakhanpaul OBE
Esther Maynard,
Mahalia France Mir
Rehana Minhas
Sarah McMurchie
Leander Neckles
Graham O’Neill
Brenda Parkes
Phil Pavey
Constantia Pennie
Professor Andy Plikington
Anthony Robinson
Pamela Strangman
Professor Sally Tomlinson
*******

Increasing family incomes improves children’s achievement in school

Raising household incomes by £1,000 would lead to better outcomes for poorer children than spending an extra £1,000 per child on schools

 Research shows that increasing family incomes improves school achievement
To download the full pdf, click here

Explaining the data
Academics from the London School of Economics analysed over 30 different studies from across the world measuring the effects of income on children’s school achievement, cognitive development and other health and social issues. These studies found an improvement of between 5% and 27% of a standard deviation in children’s cognitive outcomes associated with an increase in their families’ income equivalent to about £900. This represents similar value to the estimates of an increase in £1,000 spending per child on schools. To read the full report, visit http://www.jrf.org.uk/publications/does-money-affect-childrens-outcomes


*******


Tuesday, 29 July 2014

Poor children do worse at school - because they are poor!

The educational attainment gap between rich and poor would be reduced by raising the income of poorer families

To download the full pdf, click here

Explaining the data
Academics from the London School of Economics analysed over 30 different studies from across the world measuring the effects of income on children’s school achievement. They found an increase of between 5% and 27% of a standard deviation on a child’s ability to learn resulting from an increase in income of about £900. Even assuming the lower 5% improvement in cognitive ability per £900 spent, this suggests that increasing the income of Free School Meals children to the UK average (at a cost of around £6,000 per child) would halve the difference in Key Stage2 test results (aged 11) between Free School Meals children and the rest. To see the full report visit http://www.jrf.org.uk/publications/does-money-affect-childrens-outcomes


**********

Monday, 21 July 2014

Differences in income between children are increasingly likely to be mirrored as adults. Social mobility worsening in UK

What people earn in life increasingly reflects what their parents earned

To download the full pdf, click here

Explaining the data
The Institute of Education used data from the National Child Development Study (NCDS) of children born in 1958 and the British Cohort Study (BCS) of children born in 1970 to compare the association between parental income and adult income for each of the cohorts. For the children born in 1958, the IoE found that just under 30% of the differences in incomes in childhood are mirrored in what they earn around the age 40. For those born in 1970 this has gone up to around 40% of childhood circumstances being reflected in what they earn in adulthood. There is no more recent data, because funding to study a cohort of children born in the 1980s was scrapped, but findings from a cohort born in 1991 should emerge in 2020. To see the full report visithttp://repec.ioe.ac.uk/REPEc/pdf/qsswp1401.pdf


*******

Wednesday, 18 June 2014

Though the UK's total wealth is amongst the highest in the world, many more people cannot afford to eat.

the number of people using food banks has rocketed while food is getting more expensive and kids go to school hungry

To download the full pdf, click here

Explaining the data:
This data comes from ‘Hard to Swallow’ a report funded by Kellogs and the Centre for Economics and Business Research (CEBR) and published in March 2013 – and chart data from the Trussell Trust available via http://www.trusselltrust.org/stats 


*********