Showing posts with label crisis. Show all posts
Showing posts with label crisis. Show all posts

Wednesday, 11 March 2015

The rich get richer, the poor get poorer. What a surprise!

Between 2007 and 2013, cash benefits paid to the richest fifth of the population increased by 42%. For the poorest fifth, benefits fell by 5%

Since the recession, cash benefits have INCREASED for the richest fifth of the population, but declined for the poorest fifth
To download the full pdf, click here

Explaining the data
Here we have relied on a dataset produced by the Office for National Statistics. This data tracks the effects of taxes and benefits on household income over time. The series runs from 1977 to 2013 and is available here (table 14a). These figures are produced based on the average amount of cash benefits, original income and gross income received by households across the income distribution. We have rounded figures to the nearest whole number for clarity, but for accuracy the bottom, middle and top income quintiles of the income distribution saw an average real-term change in their receipt of cash benefits by 4.6%, 3.3% and 41.6% respectively. Calculations are based on RPI deflation

********

Saturday, 22 November 2014

Poorest 80% of population have seen their share of incomes drop since 1979

Displaying

To download the full pdf, click here

Explaining the data
This chart is taken from Professor John Hills’s book 'Changing Lives, Welfare State. Why we really are all in it together’ published by ‘Policy Press’ in November 2014 The figures are taken from earlier analyses by Jenkins SP and Cowell F 'Dwarfs and Giants in the 1980s: Trends in UK income distribution' (1993) and Adams N, Carr J, Collins J, Johnson G and Matejic P, Households Below Average Income: An analysis of the income distribution, 1994/95 to 2010/11(2012). 



*********

Friday, 12 September 2014

Pay for everyone, including middle income earners, has fallen since 1994 - except for the rich

Middle-income earners are not getting their fair share of the proceeds of growth
To download the full pdf, click here

Explaining the data
This chart is taken from the Government’s Sustainable Development Indicators published by the Department for the Environment, Food and Rural Affairs in July 2013. You can read full publication online at https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/223992/0_SDIs_final__2_.pdf

********

Tuesday, 13 May 2014

Income inequality in the UK - watch this shocking new video

Income inequality in the UK - watch this shocking new video
Income inequality has become an increasingly important political issue in recent months. Our new 3 minute animation outlines the size of the paygap and compares the situation with other European countries, where similar levels of total income are shared much more evenly, meaning that people at the bottom and in the middle have more.

The film highlights how:
  • pay for top bosses nearly doubled over the past decade, while ordinary workers wages remained the same
  • a FTSE 100 CEO earns four times as much in one year as the average worker does in their entire lifetime
  • if total incomes in the UK were divided as evenly as in Denmark or the Netherlands, 99 per cent of households would be better off by nearly £3,000 per year

 


******

The richest 100 people in the UK are as rich as the poorest 19 million. "All in it together"!

The richest 100 people in the UK have as much wealth as the poorest 30% of the population

To download the full pdf click here

Explaining the data

Based on research by the Equality Trust following analysis of the Sunday Times richlist and data from the Office of National Statistics. For full details visit http://www.equalitytrust.org.uk/news/wealth-increase-britains-100-richest-would-pay-175-million-living-wage-jobs. 


************

Saturday, 3 May 2014

Pay has grown more quickly for the super-rich than low-paid workers

CEO pay has grown by more than 350% since the minimum wage was introduced. The minimum wage itself has increased by just 75%
To download the full pdf click here

Explaining the data:
The data on the minimum wage is available via https://www.gov.uk/ national-minimum-wage-rates... the data on CEO pay is taken from the Manifest/MM&K Total Director Remuneration Survey 2012 and 2013. 


********

Monday, 28 April 2014

Average worker would take 158 years to earn what CEO earns in a year

You'd need to work until the year 2172 to earn the average FTSE 100 CEO's annual pay
To download the full pdf click here

Explaining the data:
CEO pay of £4.25 million is taken from the Manifest survey of CEO pay, while workers’ pay of £27,000 is taken from the Office of National Statistics Annual Survey of Hours and Earnings.


*********

Monday, 24 March 2014

Housing is unaffordable for most people in normal jobs

Housing is now unaffordable for most people in normal jobs

To download the full pdf click here

Explaining the data:
Average housing costs are calculated using the Valuation Office Agency private rental market statistics, plus data on energy and water bills from the Department for Energy and Climate Change and Ofwat.Gross incomes are calculated using pay data from Government sources. These include the NHS Careers website, the government teaching careers website and the annual survey or hours and earnings. Income tax, national insurance and council tax for Band A properties net of 25% single person’s discount (taken from a Department for Communities and Local Government report) are all considered. 



*******


Saturday, 8 March 2014

The Wellingborough Diggers of 1650: A tribute to Mischief-making on a grand scale


The Wellingborough Diggers:
A Tribute to Mischief-making on a Grand Scale

I would like dedicate this short article to Les Parsons. Les is responsible for undertaking research in the Digger movement in general and the Wellingborough Diggers in particular. Much of what I am about to say is as a result of this work. But Les is also a local political campaigner whom I deeply respect and admire. Without Les I would have probably remained unaware of the Diggers.

I have called it “a tribute to mischief-making on a grand scale” because the contribution of the Diggers cannot be underestimated as we wrestle with opposing the gross and disgusting inequalities of wealth and income across the globe that is there for all to see and developing a vision of a different kind of society in the future. The Diggers dreamt of a new type of world and that dream is still with us today, albeit the language in which the dream is described may have changed over the passage of time. I have used the term mischief, because this is the word used to describe the Diggers at the time. A contemporary letter of April 15th 1649 (1650)[1], from the Government of the day (Council of State) to “ … Mr. Pentlow, Justice of Peace for County Northampton” said:

“We approve your proceedings with the Levellers in those parts, and doubt not you are sensible of the mischief these designs tend to, and of the necessity to proceed effectively against them. If the laws in force against those who intrude upon other men’s properties, and that forbid and direct the punishing of all riotous assemblies and seditious and tumultuous meetings, be put in execution, there will not want means to preserve the public peace against attempts of this sort of people”.

In particular I draw your attention to then words “… mischief these designs tend to, and of the necessity to proceed effectively against them.” What were the Digger’s designs and actions that were so threatening that “… there will not want means to preserve the public peace”?

In a unique “Declaration of the Grounds and Reasons” issued by the Wellingborough Diggers in 1649 (1650), we have an opportunity to hear their own voice across the centuries:

Their actions were very simple:
  • “(We) have begun and give consent to dig up, manure and sow corn upon the Commons and Waste Ground called Bareshanks, belonging to the people of Wellinborrow by those that have subscribed and hundreds more that give consent”
Why were they taking this action?
  • We are in Wellinborrow in one parish of 1169 persons that receive alms… our trading is decayed; our wives and children cry for bread; our lives are a burden to us, divers of us having 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 in family, and we cannot get bread for them by our labour. Rich men’s hearts are hardened; they will not give us if we beg at their doors. If we steal, the law will end our lives. Divers of the poor are starved to death already; and it were better for us that are living to die by the Sword than by the famine …”
How did they justify their action – what underpinned the philosophy or set of ideas that encouraged them?


  • “We find (in the word of God) that God made the earth for the use and comfort of all mankind, and sat him in it to till and dress it…
  • God never gave to any sort of people that they should have it all to themselves and shut out the rest …
  • We find that no creature that ever God made was deprived of the benefit of the Earth, but mankind … it is nothing but covetousness, pride and hardness of heart that hath caused man so far to degenerate.
  • That in the last day the oppressor and proud man shall cease and God will restore the waste places of the Earth to the use and comfort of man, and that none shall hurt or destroy in all His Holy Mountain.
  • We have great encouragement from two righteous Acts, which parliament of England has set forth, the one against kingly power and the other to make England a free Common-wealth”

Within a few weeks (we do not know for sure how long it lasted) the Digger enterprise in Wellingborough had been brought to an end by the forces of “law and order” - unleashed by the nice Mr. Pentlow, Justice of the Peace, on instructions from the Government of Cromwell. The Diggers’ leaders were arrested, taken to Northampton, and charged with riot and affray. After this nothing is known of what happened to them.

I don’t think it was so much what the Diggers did that rattled the ruling class of the day (is sowing seed on common land so threatening?), so much as the ideas that the declaration promoted and was spreading throughout the country. Are there resonances here of how the Occupy Movement and UK-Uncut and other movements against injustice around the world are being treated today?

The Digger movement was reflective of the times - the flourishing of democracy (albeit limited to men of property). This was also the time when the monarchy was ended, in January 1649, with the beheading of Charles I.

Within the ranks of the Cromwellian New Model Army there was the Leveller movement with its call for wider political democracy (“the poorest that lives hath as true a right to give a vote as well as the richest and greatest”), and it was time of flourishing debate and discussion on the future society that people wanted to see where demands for political democracy went hand in and with demands for economic democracy through the common ownership of land. The writings of Gerrard Winstanley especially spring to mind – the spiritual leader of the Digger movement.

All this amounted to a vision of an alternative society without exploitation, without private ownership of land, respect for the environment, and a society of equals, without “Kingly power” and a Common-wealth for all. Such ideas had to be smashed, and smashed quickly, and they were!

But smashing the movements of that time – the Levellers, the Diggers - was easier than smashing these new ideas that were emerging and these ideas have resonated throughout our history right up to the 21st century. We owe a tremendous debt to those “ragged band” of Diggers (that Leon Rosselson refers to in his famous ballad) and we have a duty to keep this vision alive, and to struggle against the injustices of today, as the Diggers did in the 17th Century.


Paul Crofts

The Diggers – a brief history

This information is taken from Wikipedia. Footnotes are mine.

The year 1649 was a time of great social unrest in England. The Parliamentarians had won the First English Civil War but failed to negotiate a constitutional settlement with the defeated King Charles I. When members of Parliament and the Grandees in the New Model Army were faced with Charles' perceived duplicity, they tried and executed him.

Government through the King's Privy Council was replaced with a new body called the Council of State, which due to fundamental disagreements within a weakened Parliament was dominated by the Army. Many people were active in politics, suggesting alternative forms of government to replace the old order. Royalists wished to place King Charles II on the throne; men like Oliver Cromwell wished to govern with a plutocratic Parliament voted in by an electorate based on property, similar to that which was enfranchised before the civil war; agitators called Levellers, influenced by the writings of John Lilburne, wanted parliamentary government based on an electorate of every male head of a household; Fifth Monarchy Men advocated a theocracy; and the Diggers, led by Winstanley, advocated a more radical solution.

Gerrard Winstanley and 14 others published a pamphlet[2] in which they called themselves the True Levellers to distinguish their ideas from those of the Levellers. Once they put their idea into practice and started to cultivate common land, they became known as "Diggers" by both opponents and supporters. The Diggers' beliefs were informed by the Winstanley's writings which envisioned an ecological interrelationship between humans and nature, acknowledging the inherent connections between people and their surroundings[3].   Winstanley declared that "true freedom lies where a man receives his nourishment and preservation, and that is in the use of the earth".

An undercurrent of political thought which has run through English society for many generations and resurfaced from time to time (for example, the Peasants' Revolt in 1381) was present in some of the political factions of the 17th century, including those who formed the Diggers, and held the common belief that England had become subjugated by the "Norman Yoke." This legend offered an explanation that at one time a golden Era had existed in England before the Norman Conquest in 1066. From the conquest on, the Diggers argued, the "common people of England" had been robbed of their birthrights and exploited by a foreign ruling class.



St. George's Hill, Weybridge, Surrey
The Council of State received a letter in April 1649 reporting that several individuals had begun to plant vegetables in common land on Saint George's Hill, Weybridge near Cobham,   Surrey at a time when food prices reached an all-time high. Sanders reported that they had invited "all to come in and help them, and promise them meat, drink, and clothes." They intended to pull down all enclosures and cause the local populace to come and work with them. They claimed that their number would be several thousand within ten days. "It is feared they have some design in hand." In the same month, the Diggers issued their most famous pamphlet and manifesto, called "The True Levellers Standard Advanced".

At the behest of the local landowners, the commander of the New Model Army, Sir Thomas Fairfax, duly arrived with his troops and interviewed Winstanley and another prominent member of the Diggers, William Everard. Everard suspected that the Diggers were in serious trouble and soon left the group. Fairfax, meanwhile, having concluded that Diggers were doing no harm, advised the local landowners to use the courts.

Winstanley remained and continued to write about the treatment they received. The harassment from the Lord of the Manor, Francis Drake (not the famous Francis Drake, who had died more than 50 years before), was both deliberate and systematic: he organised gangs in an attack on the Diggers, including numerous beatings and an arson attack on one of the communal houses. Following a court case, in which the Diggers were forbidden to speak in their own defence, they were found guilty of being Ranters, a radical sect associated with liberal sexuality (though in fact Winstanley had reprimanded Ranter Laurence Clarkson for his sexual practices). Having lost the court case, if they had not left the land, then the army could have been used to enforce the law and evict them; so they abandoned St George's Hill in August 1649, much to the relief of the local freeholders.

Wellingborough, Northamptonshire
There was another community of Diggers close to Wellingborough in Northamptonshire. In March 1649, the community published a declaration which started:

A Declaration of the Grounds and Reasons why we the Poor Inhabitants of the Town of Wellingborrow, in the County of Northampton, have begun and give consent to dig up, manure and sow Corn upon the Common, and waste ground, called Bareshanke[4] belonging to the Inhabitants of Wellinborrow, by those that have Subscribed and hundreds more that give Consent....

This colony was probably founded as a result of contact with the Surrey Diggers. In late March 1649, four emissaries from the Surrey colony were arrested in Buckinghamshire bearing a letter signed by the Surrey Diggers including Gerrard Winstanley and Robert Coster inciting people to start Digger colonies and to provide money for the Surrey Diggers. According to the newspaper A Perfect Diurnall the emissaries had travelled a circuit through the counties of Surrey, Middlesex, Hertfordshire, Bedfordshire, Buckinghamshire, Berkshire, Huntingdonshire and Northamptonshire before being apprehended.

On April 15, 1649, the Council of State ordered Mr Pentlow, a justice of the peace for Northamptonshire to proceed against 'the Levellers in those parts' and to have them tried at the next Quarter Session. The Iver Diggers recorded that, nine of the Wellingborough Diggers were arrested and imprisoned in Northampton jail and although no charges could be proved against them the justice refused to release them.

Captain William Thompson, the leader of the failed "Banbury mutiny" of Levellers (most were killed in the churchyard in Burford whilst trying to escape) was killed - in a skirmish on his way to join the Digger community in Wellingborough - by soldiers loyal to Oliver Cromwell in May 1649.



[1] Note that there is often confusion around dates due to a change in the calendar at this time. It is sometimes difficult to know if event took place in 1649 or 1650. I have changed some of the dates from the Wikipedia entry - that the “The Diggers – Brief History” (see below) is drawn from - to, hopefully, make the dates more consistent.
[2] The New Law Of Righteousness (January 26, 1649), Gerrard Winstanley
[3] The Diggers have also been described as the first British “communists” and “socialists” because they also sought an egalitarian society, challenged the privilege and wealth accruing from land ownership, and opposed “kingly power”. They said in the Wellingborough Digger Declaration: “God made the Earth for use and comfort of all mankind, and let him in to till and dress it, and said, that in the sweat of his brow he should eat his bread; and also we find that, that God never gave it to any sort of people, that they should have it all to themselves, and shut out all the rest, but he saith, The Earth hath he given to all the children of men, which is everyman”
[4] Bareshanke is a piece of land on the left-hand side of the road coming from Wellingborough (from the Park Farm Industrial Estate past the “Mad Mile”) at the junction where it meets the Sywell to Little Harrowden Road.



*********

Thursday, 7 November 2013

The Coalition's record on equality and human rights





*****

Wednesday, 15 May 2013

Wellingborough showing of film Spirit of '45 this Sunday


There will be a special showing of Ken Loach's film Spirit of '45, followed by discussion.

This Sunday, May 19th at 7.00 pm in the Rising Sun pub, corner of Cannon Street/Mill Road


This has been organised by Independent Socialists in Wellingborough in conjunction with Left Unity

ALL WELCOME


******

Sunday, 28 April 2013

Friday, 22 February 2013

Thursday, 14 February 2013

An uncanny resemblance?

Did anyone notice the uncanny resemblance between "evil" Richard III and our skeletal Peter Bone, Member of Parliament for Wellingborough, in last weeks Observer  cartoon?

If you missed it, here it is:



The cartoon accurately depicts #Bonethebigot's current pet prejudices: homophobia and Europhobia, and his hatred of the ConLib government which he sees as far too "liberal".

Isn't is time we, the decent people of Wellingborough, stood up and said we don't accept him as our "representative" in Parliament? Isn't it time we said loudly "not in our name" Mr. Bone!


*******

Thursday, 27 December 2012

"No Pets. No DSS": the demonisation of a new group?

During the 1960s it was not uncommon to see signs on houses or flats that were to let that stated "No pets, no Irish and no Blacks". Quite rightly it would now be considered totally unacceptable to publish such racist and discriminatory signs - and they are also now illegal.

However, I recently discovered similar signs on display in an estate agents in Wellingborough. This time, however, the group now being discriminated against are those in receipt of welfare benefits (DSS) and the cards in the shop window read: "Sorry (sic!). No pets. No DSS" - see photos of the cards on display below. 

I must say that I was shocked that a new group of people are now being collectively demonised and discriminated against in such a demeaning way when trying to find housing for themselves and/or their families. Could this be the consequence of the recent high profile attacks by some politicians on welfare "scroungers" and attempts to set so-called "deserving"/working poor from those less "deserving" who are not in work. Or is it simply reflective of the fact that housing benefit no longer covers the rental of even the cheapest of private rented accommodation? So where will the poor - whether "deserving", "undeserving", working or not working  - going to live? What sort of society are we?

Although we may have moved on a little from the racism of the 1960s, are we now re-creating new groups to exclude and dehumanise? Sometimes I wonder how much progress we are really making and how little we seem to learn from the nasty activities of the past.



******

Wednesday, 10 October 2012

Guest post: Where is my pension?

I was queuing at the bank, it was a long queue, when the man in front of me  got chatting about queues and banks and he told me that he was just about to  retire and had found out that his pension fund was 20 per cent less than anticipated. He knew he had been swindled but he did not know how. This is  the result:

Where is my pension?

The Bank boys say

We gamble and you pay - OK

The Eton boys say

We rule and we stay  - Olé

The Work boys say, as is their way

We always fucking pay

But this time no way - Hosea

This time the Bank and the Eton boys pay

There is no other way.

Ok

Olé

Hosea

© Andi McNib

*************************

Wednesday, 11 April 2012

Guest Poem: Dear Mr. Cameron.....

I was sent this poem by a friend and I thought it worth putting on my blog. I am not sure who the author is, but would like to congratulate them for summing up so eloquently how so many people feel.
Dear Mr. Cameron, you say we're broken and sick
But we're just sick of being broke and putting up with this shit.
Its not pockets of society, it’s about society's pockets
This country eats its young, it’s up to us to stop it
Our Tuition fees tripled and EMA axed
20% V.A.T. and even more and more tax

Tell us Mr. Cameron, how are we supposed to cope?
Growing up with no future, no voice and no hope.
Born into a greedy, materialistic world
Money loving capitalistic little boys and girls

We looted JD and Argos, you say its 'criminal and senseless'
But MPs can take kickbacks disguised as 'expenses'
'Do as I say not as I do' is the governments call
As Banks take the piss and we ALL take the fall
Police and Parliament call us rioters and ‘moral lacking’ vandals
Whilst the Chief Commissioner AND Assistant resign over 'Hacking' scandals

Where do we find good, honest role models to follow?
When our so called should-be leaders are so shallow and hollow
So we're left jaded, misguided and ultimately lost
As we rage against the machine you're just counting the cost
Instead of examining the problem to get to the root
You ignore all the signs and turn a blind eye to truth

Please Mr Cameron don't just react to save face
Don't play Mr. Tough to make the public feel safe
Your 'Fightback' campaign and the 'all nighter' courts
May have sent out a 'message' but justice fell short

BBC and SKY News distorting the facts
Subtlety pitching the whites against blacks
But this ain't about colour, race, or aggression
It's about the corruption that caused the recession

Violence is not acceptable Mr Cameron we agree
But if it wasn't for the riots would you even see me?
Would you see the gangs or the deprived neighbourhoods
Or the fact the property ladder is off bounds for good
We regret loss of life, we regret we caused harm
R.I.P. Shazad Ali, Abdul Musavir and Haroon Jahan

Mark Duggan’s death was not the cause of the riot.
His family's protest was peaceful and quiet.
Still 333 deaths since 1998
By the hands of Police but not ONE prosecution to date
There's only so much a young nation can take.
But you squeeze and you push, and you bend ‘til we break
Then we blow leaving anarchy and chaos in our wake
So learn a lesson Mr Cameron don't repeat the mistake
You have choice wrong or right but which will you choose?
Signed: A generation with nothing to lose.
**************

Monday, 5 March 2012

Guest Post by Steve Lytton: A Social Contract - A time to reconsider?


With it now increasingly clear - to those willing to see - that capitalism is incapable of providing the kind of society that can afford its members any kind of secure and stable future, and with the political elite seemingly currently incapable of providing an alternative vision that can motivate the youth and the vast majority of the adult population, it is perhaps time to start examining what structures could be worked towards that might lead towards a more cohesive and progressive future for all.

The current situation (leaving aside global warming, which needs to be tacked differently) is as follows:
  • An army of unemployed youth with little chance of worthwhile, viable job prospects leading to the kind of life style currently envisioned as “acceptable and socially desirable”.
  • High unemployment, with little likelihood of there being enough adequately paid jobs in the future.
  • An existing infrastructure that requires significant renewal.
  • A range of existing problems requiring urgent solutions, among which:

o   Moving excess water from some areas to areas of water shortage.
o   Energy resource and waste recycling problems.
o   Travel and transport problems that just won’t be solvable by the conversion to electric cars, however desirable. Such could be auto-drive, underground-cable-driven, circulating vehicles.
o   The alienation of people from the political process.
o   The depopulation of and loss of facilities and transport links from rural villages in many regions.
o   The shortage of accommodation in areas where work is available, while considerable existing and potential housing stock remains empty and decaying.
o   The insulation of houses of many elderly and less-advantaged people’s accommodation.
o   The need for confidence-building and appropriate skills development and education for the young.
o   The increasing need for facilities and support for the elderly and infirm.
o   Increasing racial and group tensions.
o   There are many others
The failure of the current political elite to offer solutions or any vision of an alternative direction other than more of the same bankrupt policies will undoubtedly result in an increase in the indebtedness of the populace at large, in an ever-growing gap between the rich and poor, and will certainly act as a catalyst for more riots, a growth in prison numbers, etc.

All these will put growing strains on the already dramatically-deficit-hit national budgets, and whether or not all this leads us towards more wars (real, imaginary, trade or Cold) we shall just have to wait and see.

No wonder that many young people feel estranged from a society that they haven’t helped create and for whose ills they are paying and are going to continue to pay, perhaps for the rest of their lives? Nor is it strange that all too many people consider that having virtual friends (and avatars and apparent real activity) is more fruitful than voting for all-to-often false promises and more of the same. This is all the sadder when one considers the energy and enthusiasm that the young can manifest when suitably motivated.

However, perhaps an alternative more optimistic approach can be advanced – one that brings the power and imagination of the youth to bear in the creation of the society that they are going to live in. 

The power of IT and video games, media programmes, etc., together with the lowering of the voting age to 16 – all these and other mechanisms could be used as means for gaining the acceptance, over time, for the creation of a two-year youth social service aimed at all young people, no matter from what social class, religion, gender, etc., nor at what age they leave school. Such a service would provide the human power and imagination to tackle these social challenges, as well as helping individuals develop to their full potential and strengthening inter-group relations.

It is fundamental that such a scheme be aimed at tackling some of the major problems facing us all, while simultaneously developing those skills required for living in the kind of progressive society that is urgently needed for the health of our and other species. It must NOT be a means of massaging the unemployment figures, of providing cheap labour for employers nor as a social control mechanism. Participation should involve individual training and development plans; choice of and joint elaboration of project activities; motivational and support programmes, etc. It could also help break the pernicious unemployment cultural cycle in families or areas in which work has not featured for generations.

The scheme could also open up possibilities for those over 50 or other skilled and experienced persons for whom the current job market no longer seems to offer opportunities, as well as creating a “working window” of two years – a “breathing space” - opening up jobs that would normally be picked up by graduates and school leavers.

It is clear that certain aspects of these ideas will hardly meet with universal, if any, approval; the cost might appear prohibitive, but would be amortised in all sorts of ways. However, money seems always to be found when necessary and the magnitude of the challenges ahead need extraordinary investment and that the members of society become increasingly involved in creating a society of their own. Such a society will not come about spontaneously. There needs to be a strategic approach and the political will. The degree of wastage of people’s potential is nothing short of a scandal, and works against the creation of the kind of decent society that most people would wish to live in.

There must be another way forward – a socialised solution to problems that face us all. This kind of thinking will need much further elaboration, but should not just be rejected out of hand. What other credible alternatives have surfaced? None, I would suggest.

Steve Lytton, 
Arcy sur Cure, 
France


****************